UK PM Burnham Approves British Bases for US Strikes on Iran
New British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has approved the use of UK bases by the United States for "defensive" strikes on Iran, Bloomberg News reported Tuesday.
Developing story — this page will be updated as information becomes available.

LONDON — New British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has approved the use of United Kingdom military bases by the United States for “defensive” strikes on Iran, according to a Bloomberg News report cited by Middle East Eye on Tuesday. The decision brings a second NATO government formally into the operational chain of the ongoing U.S.–Iran war.
What We Know
Burnham, who recently took office as prime minister, gave the authorization for U.S. forces to use British bases in support of what London is describing as “defensive” strikes against Iran, per the Bloomberg report relayed by Middle East Eye’s live blog. The approval was made public Tuesday.
Neither the reported disclosure nor Downing Street’s public statements have named which specific British installations are covered. The United States has historically operated alongside U.K. forces at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and at RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus during Middle East operations. British basing has been a repeated point of Iranian political pressure since the spring, when Tehran warned Paris and London against transiting the Strait of Hormuz.
The approval lands as the U.S. strike campaign against Iran continues into its second week, with U.S. Central Command having carried out a tenth consecutive night of strikes on Iranian targets including Bandar Abbas.
What We Don’t Know
Downing Street has not published the full text or scope of Burnham’s authorization. The specific bases, categories of U.S. missions permitted, and any geographic or target limits attached to the “defensive” framing remain unconfirmed. It is also not clear whether Parliament was consulted before the decision, whether a formal Cabinet vote was taken, or how the authorization interacts with existing U.S.–U.K. basing agreements. This is a developing story.
Context
Burnham’s move formalizes a level of British participation that had previously been informal or ambiguous. It also breaks with the more cautious posture London and Paris took in May, when the two governments pushed a UN Security Council counter-resolution on Hormuz freedom of navigation rather than align squarely with U.S. military action.
The approval comes as the Pentagon confirms mounting U.S. casualties from the conflict, including nearly 100 U.S. service members injured and a third U.S. soldier, Sgt. Michael Swinton, killed at Erbil airbase during a controlled detonation of Iranian drone ordnance. Iranian-aligned forces have also targeted U.S. facilities across the region, with three drones shot down near the U.S. consulate in Erbil on Tuesday.
What To Watch
- Whether Downing Street publishes the authorization or is forced to defend it in the House of Commons this week.
- Iran’s response, including any threat or move against U.K. shipping in the Gulf or against British personnel deployed to the region.
- Whether other NATO members — particularly France and Germany — follow London’s move or publicly distance themselves from it.
Found this useful? Share it.


